25A021 Law, Lawfare and Chaos by Jim Davies, 5/27/2025

 

Opposition to the present proxy war on Russia is led in France by Marine Le Pen, a kind of Trump-like figure, who leads a party called Rassemblement National. Last month she was found guilty by Macron's court monopoly of some minor financial irregularity and sentenced to four years in prison and barred from seeking political office for five. Macron has thereby protected himself from his main opposition. That's a classic example of "Lawfare." Another is last week's ominous threat by the German "Justice Minister", Frau Hubig, to ban the fast-rising and very popular Alternative für Deutschland, a party comparable to Le Pen's. The last German Chancellor to ban rival parties was Adolf Hitler.

It provides yet another reason why the creation of "laws" is a bad idea. Once one class in a society has the de-facto power to create rules for everyone to obey, it will continue to do so indefinitely, until (as now) there are so many that nobody can read them all in a single lifetime. That itself makes nonsense of the whole idea, but there's worse: it means that there's a virtually infinite pool of laws from which anyone at the top of the heap can draw so as to hobble his rival.

That very nearly happened in the US last year, but happily Donald Trump was able to use his reserves of courage and money, and prevail in November. It has now happened in France, and in Romania - where Calin Georgescu actually won the first round of Presidential elections last year but whose candidacy was then invalidated by the Supreme Court! The problem was that he stands for an end to NATO's hostility to Russia, and that would have upset the applecart. Lawfare at work, actively promoting war.

Now, it's often claimed that if there were not a structure of laws, there would be chaos. It's hard to imagine a greater state of chaos (the bad kind) than war, and as above law is now being used to promote war, but that's the claim. Let's check it out.

Literally, it's perfectly true and valid. Without laws, there's be chaos; but wait: what exactly is chaos? There's a bad kind, involving violence, but there's also the much more common good kind, involving none.

The whole of nature operates in a state of chaos.

That's pointed out by L K Samuels in his book In Defense of Chaos. Every stone and grain of sand or soil is placed chaotically; every ocean wave breaks in chaos, every moisture drop in a cloud takes a random place, every plant grows (or tries to grow) where its seed happens to fall, the very generation of life in mammals is begun by a random (chaotic) fertilization of eggs. Chaos rules, if you'll allow me an oxymoron. All around us, nothing is other than chaotic!
 
And yet to our eyes the result functions very well and is beautiful! Isn't that amazing? - yes, I know, we humans, as random results of unplanned evolution, have developed ideas of "beauty" to reflect what we see around us, so beauty is subjective. Never mind. From awesome mountain ranges to the intricacy of a leaf or a snowflake, beauty is endemic in the results of chaotic processes. "There is no detailed blueprint," said physicist Paul Davies (no relation) "only a set of [natural] laws with an inbuilt facility for making interesting things happen. The universe is free to create itself as it goes along."
 
Nonetheless, one of those "interesting things" is that we like to create order so as to get things done. That's not always true; some work best in an office with files all over the floor and furniture - but usually it is. Each of us is entitled to bring as much order, or as much chaos, as we wish - into our own lives. But not into anyone else's.
 
Law attempts to order not just the legislator's life, but everyone else's too. It consists of his (and his political friends') opinions, backed by a gun. Fine and dandy if "everyone else" has freely volunteered to obey them, as in a company or a club; but otherwise, it's a gross violation of natural rights. It turns reasoning, choosing human beings into machines and removes responsibility. Law achieves the very opposite of its pretended purpose: to hold each person accountable for his or her moral conduct.
 
As for the righting of wrongs, the 2019 ZGBlog Justice in the ZGS describes how that will likely work after government has disappeared, along with all its dumpster loads of laws.

 

 
What the coming free society
will probably be like
 
How freedom
was lost
How it is being
regained
 
The go-to site for an
overview of a free society
 
Freedom's prerequisite:
Nothing more is needed
Nothing less will do
 

What every bureaucrat needs to know
Have them check TinyURL.com/QuitGov

 
How Government Silenced Irwin Schiff

This 2016 book tells the sad story and shows that government is even more evil than was supposed