![]() ![]()
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10A093
Sweden, Deneutralized
by Jim Davies, 12/6/2010
![]() Part of the US payoff to the Swedish government for labeling Julian Assange as "wanted" emerged quietly late last week: the State Department has declared the country to be "no longer neutral." That was intended as a favor. I don't think it's a favor at all, and dare say quite a lot of
Swedes will agree. Governments there have been dreadful
domestically for almost a century, prompting one well-renowned
journalist to lament What Happened to Sweden? Even so, those governments all did one thing right: they kept the country neutral, following a policy fixed in 1812 after losing Finland to Russia. Though literally surrounded by combatants, they declined to waste blood and treasure by joining the slaughterfests of WW-I and WW-II, and noisily opposed the US war in Vietnam, famously welcoming refugees from the US draft. All the while, that traditional work ethic kept living standards among the highest in the world. Neutrality has served Swedes very well, but now, by decree in D.C., it is over; and the pathetic price of this was to allege a case of rape when a certain condom allegedly broke at a critical moment. How are the mighty fallen!
I wonder how soon Swedes will cease working for the absurd institution of government, so causing it to vanish. When they do, the work ethic will fast revive because there will be no other way to eat, the living standards will rocket up because no parasites will prevent it, immigrants will arrive only to enjoy freedom, not welfare; relations among the sexes will be the business of those involved and nobody else at all, and neutrality will be re-established because the disinterest of Swedes in the antics of any residual governments elsewhere will be profound.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |