|
24A033 Two Killers, Not One by Jim Davies, 8/27/2024
In the coming zero government society, there will be no political assassinations. None. I can be certain of that, because there will be no politicians to try to kill.
When one faction of the political world tries to kill someone in another, it's common to announce wihin hours that it was done by a "lone gunman", so as to deflect blame and attention from the real culprits; and sometimes it's true. John Hinckley acted solo, for example. But it was not true of the JFK job, and it took thirty years to get a reasonable handle on who was involved in that conspiracy. The attempt to kill Donald Trump may be solved faster. This ZGBlog offers one, partial theory.
Very little help has come from the "public servants" who are supposed to keep us well informed, but several tireless and talented people have, fortunately, gathered some facts. John Cullen is one, Mike Adams another, but as I see it both made errors - no blame, their efforts were honest - but Dr Chris Martenson has in my view done the best job so far and this relies a lot on his work.
Eight shots were fired at DJT, in two bursts of 2 or 3 seconds each: one of three shots, at measured intervals with at least the first carefully aimed, and one of five, triggered rapidly in his general direction but without accurate aiming. Both volleys came from what's called "Building 6", about 450 feet from the West-facing podium and to its North. The alleged "lone gunman" was Tom Crooks, who had made his way to the roof ridge of Building 6. All around him were cops and rally-goers, many equipped with cell phones with video and audio recording ability.
One such was a person with a smart phone near the West end of the building, which made a good recording of all eight shots; she's called "Source 4." Dr Martenson analyzed the resulting sound characteristics, shown below.
The whitish strip across the middle shows the amplitude or loudness of all the sounds recorded, while the orange panel below it is their sonogram. It's worth watching Martenson's good, half-hour explanation of it all, here. The recording offers four proofs that two shooters were active, not one as the government's "Official Narrative" claims - just as it did for JFK in 1963.
The first proof is easy: just listen to the two volleys. They sound different. Not just the frequency of trigger-pulling, but the nature of the bangs. The first three are clear, the last five sound a bit distorted. Obviously, not the same gun, or not in the same place.
The second proof comes from the orange columns above the eight shot sounds. Those of the first three are somewhat broken, while those from the second five are strong and orange all the way up. The height, on this sonogram, represents the frequency spectrum; bass at the bottom, soprano further up. It's clear that the second volley was emitting five bangs with a similar volume at all frequencies, but the first volley had some gaps. Obviously again, not the same gun - or not in the same environment, and between the two volleys there was no time for a single shooter to move.
The third proof relates to the echoes. Each sharp vertical line denoting a shot is followed by a shorter one from its echo, off some flat surface such as a wall, and Martenson has marked the time difference across the sonogram horizontally; 0.08 seconds for the first volley but 0.17 seconds for the second. It took twice as long for the echoes to reach the smart phone recorder from each of the five shots in the second volley, as it did from the three shots in the first. Very clearly, the two sources were in different places, and again, there was no time to move. Obviously, not the same gun.
The fourth proof neatly correlates this Source 4 sonogram with the one analyzed earlier from the microphones on the Trump podium. Using the difference in time between the detection of the whistle or crack of the each passing bullet, and the arrival of the sound wave from each gun discharge, that one proved that all 8 shots were fired from the same distance - as "heard" from the podium. Therefore, it recorded accurately the intervals between each shot, and if there was only one shooter that data must be identical, from wherever observed and measured.
But Source 4 was at the West end of Building 6, so the gunshot sounds reached her traveling West, not South; and Martenson's helper "shinesprite4" compared the two sets of intervals between shots and found that the first 3 were almost identical but that the last five arrived about 33 milliseconds late! That means they came from further East. He reckons the difference corresponds to 17 feet; my math says it's nearer 40, but no matter; both positions are well within the perimeter of Building 6. There is therefore no doubt at all: beyond question, they came from two different guns.
Exactly where the two gunmen were located in, on or close to Building 6 need not detain us; nor whether the second volley was fired by Crooks or by a quite different, third person. The point is that there were two shooters, not one. Therefore, there was a conspiracy.
Might the conspirators have been just Tom Crooks plus a friend? - no. Reason: after refusing at first to answer Congress' question as to how many shell casings were found beside Crooks' body, later the SS 'fessed up and allowed as how there were 8. Since Tom cannot (as proven above) have fired more than 5, and since he was alone on the roof, that was an absolute lie - which it had no reason to tell, if innocent. Accordingly, they weren't innocent; the conspirators included parts of the government.
The nature of that conspiracy is wide open still to speculation. The FBI says Tom Crooks had no particular motive to kill DJT. He showed no antipathy to him stronger than that of most Democrats. He's reported to have had fantasies at school about becoming a "school shooter" and when his Dad got an AR-15 he practiced a lot at the range. He was smart at math, and a bit of a "loner" but was heading for college this Fall. Somehow, the FBI or other agent of the FedGov got him committed to helping kill Donald Trump. That's all we know, so far. When his parents have recovered a bit from their grief, perhaps they will dare to say more.
Tom Crooks was, like Lee Oswald, a patsy. This is what governments do.
PS: Last week's ZGBlog about the Cancel Culture has proven prophetic. On August 24th the French government arrested Pavel Durov when he landed at Le Bourget on a visit. Durov owns and operates Telegram, a social medium originating in Russia which allows posts without censorship; that is, Durov practices free speech. The FrenGov hates that. Its pretext was that criminals (gosh!) sometimes use it.
Tucker Carlson has denounced this as "darkness descending", Durov's rival Elon Musk has protested and so has the Russian government. These are dangerous days.
|
|
